Lake Painting

Archive for Health

Snow storms remind me of having a root canal/ also started planting some onions

They’re talking about a big snowstorm Thursday and that reminds me that I just recently had a root canal.  How come?  Because the two have a lot in common.  If you have to drive a car during or just after a snowstorm you know it isn’t fun–in fact it is often painful emotionally.

The exact same thing can be said about a root canal.

Root canals cost money and time. Ditto for snowstorms.

But then all snowstorms eventually end.  Roads always clear up. And the sun always returns and its bright rays become even brighter as they reflect off the newly fallen, crystalline snow making it whiter than white. Often, when this happens–and it usually does after a snowstorm–I feel it is a taste of heaven. Whatever it is, it is a real mood booster.

In addition I must admit the long term affects of snowstorms are real positive since they are an important source of water– which helps greatly with growing stuff which is one of the things I do.

Positive thoughts though, seldom happen when slipping and sliding on the road.   But when the snow stops and the sun comes out suddenly the world looks brighter than before, for one reason it is!  After the snow has fallen and roads are in good shape, the beauty of the newly fallen snow and the lasting wonderful affects of the moisture it provides is something that lasts for a while.

What about a root canal?  Well, until the mouth heals from the procedure there is discomfort but then in just a day or so instead of suffering with a toothache and a potential infected tooth, the tooth feels fine and the world seems to be a little cheerier place.  Also, you don’t ever have to worry about a toothache again–at least in the tooth that had its root fixed–and you still can chew as before.  Too bad the snow’s wonderful effects–its cheeriness and the moisture it provides– doesn’t last as long as a root canal!

Yesterday we planted 2000 Walla Walla onion seeds in four 1020 flats.  We plan on doing more onions tomorrow and then start our onions and soon after our tomatoes for our high tunnel.

By the way, I looked at the latest weather maps and there is a fair chance we will miss the brunt of the snowstorm.  Am I happy about that?  If we had two feet of snow on the ground I would have to say yes.  But to be honest we have at most 4 inches of snow out there and the way it looks it only has a quarter inch of liquid water in it.  In other words, instead of being analogous to a root canal, one can say it looks like it could be more like a temporary filling–won’t hurt much but won’t do much good either!

Why does our home canned tomatoes taste so much better than the stuff you buy?

As we start another medium sized (about 8 quarts) batch of spaghetti sauce from our own frozen tomato sauce something comes to mind–thinking about buying some canned tomato sauce at the store.  Why is this happening?  Well, despite the fact we canned and froze over 9 bushels of tomatoes, we are starting to run low and think of the possibility that we just might buy some tomato sauce at the store in the near future.  We have tried a number of brands, many of which say they are all natural and contain only tomatoes and salt.  If you have only used commercial tomato sauce for your spaghetti and pizza sauce you might think they are fine.  However, if you are spoiled like we are, you will notice they don’t taste the same as our homemade sauce.  What’s the difference?  Well, it is hard to explain  but I guess a delightful fresh taste of the homemade sauce sure is part of its superior flavor.

Some possibilities on why our tomato sauce tastes better are:  commercial sauce is over processed, our own tomato sauce is fresher (we normally use our sauce within 9 months of canning/freezing), we grow tomato varieties that inherently taste better, we pick our tomatoes riper,  we only hand pick our tomatoes and we basically hand process our tomatoes, although we do use a Squeezo Strainer powered by a cordless drill.  While probably all of these differences add up to a better tasting product, my feeling is that the primary difference is relatively simple–we are fussy when we pick the tomatoes, when we wash the tomatoes, when we cut them up, when we put them through the Squeezo Strainer and when we can or freeze them.  We don’t pick tomatoes from dead vines or tomatoes that have bad spots on them.  The tomatoes have to look nice before we put them in our bucket.  Then while we are washing them we throw out any tomatoes that we might have picked but we shouldn’t have.  When we cut them up if they don’t look delicious inside we toss them.  In other words we are fussy.  While we don’t wind up throwing many tomaotes that we pick away, we do avoid picking tomatoes that we feel would not be the best tasting–we actually leave as many tomatoes in the field as we put in our buckets.  Do you know how commercial  tomatoes are picked?  With machines that pick EVERYTHING. I feel this is the primary difference in taste.

FREEZING OR CANNING SAUCE, WHAT IS BETTER?

Two friends and good customers of ours, Ron and Ed, often discuss between themselves which is better, freezing or canning the sauce.  Ron says freezing and Ed canning.  Well we do both and we like both ways.  If we had unlimited freezer space we might just prefer freezing since its quicker and during tomato harvest time is money for us.

I do have a recommendation for those who also are running short of homemade sauce.  Tomato paste.  We have found that name brand cans of tomato paste can be substituted for sauce, all you need do is add more water to your recipe.  For some reason we prefer the flavor of spaghetti, pizza and other tomato based sauces if high quality commercial tomato paste is used instead of commercially canned tomato sauce.

By the way, we have a video on YouTube which shows in detail how we make our homemade tomato sauce.  To see this go to our youtube channel at www.youtube.com/magiclandfarms

The fragrance of cooking spaghetti sauce from the kitchen drifting my way is starting to trigger my starving response!  Got to go…

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Warning! Don’t Fall For the Sea Salt Hype!

 

I’m writing this to inform people that when you buy sea salt not only is it throwing money in the garbage (according to the Mayo Clinic), but it may be harmful!  To understand why, one must understand how sea salt is made.  Really simply put, seawater is evaporated and what is left is sea salt.  The logic for the hype is that sea salt contains more needed nutrients than just sodium chloride (pure salt).  This is true but dried out sewer water contains more needed nutrients as well!  Let’s face it, the sea today is basically nothing but extremely diluted sewer water since many countries dump their waste (human and industrial) directly into the sea without any treatment. Happily, the US and many other countries do treat the waste water today somewhat before dumping it in the ocean.  Even these countries didn’t do this a hundred years ago and the junk is still in the water. The EPA has put out warnings about eating swordfish and some other fish high up on the food chain since they may contain harmful amounts of mercury.  Swordfish, you see, eat smaller fish, which eat smaller fish yet, which then eat mostly plankton–you see they concentrate the mercury and other potentially harmful elements.  Remember how sea salt is made?  It is a process that basically concentrates seawater itself!  Seawater in the open ocean would be fine to drink if you just got rid of the salt.  However, when you concentrate modern seawater you wind up with elements that may be harmful.  Keep in mind the radioactivity they found in tunas which was believed to come from the March 11th 2011 Japanese nuclear disaster triggered by that huge earthquake and resultant tsunami.

 

Now you are probably wondering about regular table salt, the type you buy in small cylindrical blue containers with a girl carrying an umbrella.  Where does that salt come from?  From evaporated seawater. “So what’s the difference?”, you might ask.   Oh, I forgot to mention that regular table salt comes from ancient seas that had no man made pollution.  With the sun beating down, and no outlet to the major oceans because of shifting continents, these ancient seas dried up and created salt deposits.  They are now mined in salt mines.  Michigan now produces more salt than any other state with New York coming in a distant second.  Much of this salt goes directly into road salt.  With table salt, the mined salt is purified so it is nearly 100% sodium chloride and then ground up fine and then is sold as iodized (potassium iodine added) or non-iodized.  Iodine is a necessary element that the body needs.  Why do they purify the salt from ancient seas?  Well, you see, all seawater–even the ancient stuff–has traces of every non-gaseous natural element in existence — from lithium (Atomic Number 3) to uranium (Atomic Number 92).  This includes many necessary elements but also things such heavy metals (including arsenic).  If you don’t care about this (and I really don’t) and want pure ancient sea salt get your self some clean road salt and grind it up.  You won’t only save money you will get yourself what you really want when you hear about sea salt!  (BTW, for sanitary reasons and if you are serious about this, I would purchase large chunks of mined salt and then rinse them off, let dry and then grind them.  Even better yet, keep buying those little blue containers of salt and eat a balanced meal!)

The Winter Lettuce is DEELECIOUS!!!

CLOSED!!! Giveaway: Signed Copy of My Book “Snowball Launchers, Giant-Pumpkin Growers, and Other COOL CONTRAPTIONS.”

My Book

 

Robyn is the WINNER of my book!  I will be contacting her shortly!  You can tell your hubby that it does have something to do with a remote control gadget.  I will explaining exactly what it is in a new post.  I want to thank everyone for all your kind comments and suggestions about my book!

 

 

My book “Snowball Launchers, Giant-Pumpkin Growers, and Other COOL CONTRAPTIONS” was published by Sterling in 2006.  It has gone into its second printing and, I think, Sterling does not have plans for a third printing. :(   I am looking into publishing for Amazon’s Kindle and Barnes and Nobles’ Nook. The book is targeted at children from 6 to 15 who like to make stuff.  Many of the projects in the book were adapted from my articles that I had published in Boys’ Quest and/or Fun For Kidz magazines.  I am the Workshop editor of both magazines.

Project 15 in the book is titled “Sidewinder Thingamajig.”  Do you have any idea what this project is about?  Hint: Believe it or not it is useful and practical!  I plan on giving away a signed copy of my book to the person that describes the project the best.  This contest ends on the Ides of March (March 15).   If there are ties I will have my wife draw the winning name from my Stihl hat!  Remember, March 15th is the last date to enter this contest!

The following are two reviews of my book you might want to read.  By the way, if they weren’t flattering do you think I would mention them?

From School Library Journal

Grade 5–8—The 20 projects in this collection range from a simple “Heartbeat Monitor” to a fairly complex “Moth-Bot,” a wheeled vehicle that moves toward light with the flick of a switch. Most have strong kid appeal, though the “Snowball Launcher” and “Super-Duper Water Shooter” are likely to generate more interest than the “Drinking-Straw Dispenser.” Energetic writing makes all of the projects sound intriguing, and the process of creating working gadgets can be as much fun as the end result. Instructions are written in an engaging, conversational tone, with background information about concepts such as gravity and electricity woven into the text. The directions are fairly easy to follow, although the complexity of some of the later “contraptions” will require especially careful attention and possibly adult consultation. Diagrams are also helpful; several steps are often combined in a single illustration, but clear and consistent labeling makes them effective. Most of the projects use household materials, along with basic craft or electronic supplies. The last seven involve electricity; they are more complex and require more purchased items, such as DC motors and transistors. Fifteen of the projects have a clearly highlighted “Adult Supervision Required” note, mainly for use of drills, saws, or other sharp tools. This is a good resource for students looking for out-of-the-ordinary science projects and for curious and creative kids who just want to make something fun and different.—Steven Engelfried, Beaverton City Library, OR
Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

From Booklist

“Does your arm get tired and start hurting right in the middle of a snowball fight?” The solution to these and other conundrums (how to get maximum range out of a water shooter; how to turn a toy car into a rocket) are presented in this accessible selection of projects, many of which have appeared in magazines such as Boys’ Quest and Hopscotch for Girls. The open layouts present diagrams and step-by-step instructions for projects that include a giant-pumpkin grower, a stethoscope, and a robot, and the author encourages kids to use recycled materials, such as empty oatmeal canisters and paper-towel tubes. Fox also discusses the scientific principles each project demonstrates, making this an excellent choice for classroom use. Younger kids will need help with both the science facts and the tools (notes indicate the projects requiring adult supervision), but older ones can confidently tackle several simple contraptions on their own. Adults will welcome this selection of high-interest projects that are ready-made for collaborative, educational fun. Gillian Engberg
Copyright © American Library Association. All rights reserved

What does cloning have to do with making jams and jellies?

I’ve been perusing the textbook Modern Chemistry (2006 edition) again and I came across some interesting stuff that is related to the categories of topics I talk about on this blog.  Most specifically the Farm News and Health stuff.  When you make regular jams and jellies (not the fridge types) the table sugar, which is sucrose, you mix with the fruit and then heat breaks down into a mixture of equal parts of glucose (grape sugar) and fructose (fruit sugar).  This new mixture then tastes sweeter than the table sugar you added!  In other words, you can put less sugar than you thought and still have a nice and sweet jam or jelly to put on your toast in the morning.  What happens is that the acid and heat combination breaks down sucrose into its two components — glucose and fructose.  This is also probably the reason when you bake most fruit pies–say apple or peach — it seems sweeter than you thought it should.  Personally I prefer a less sweet pie which means I tell my wife and daughters to go light on the sugar when baking fruit pies.  Technically, this process is called hydrolysis.

Now I bet you are wondering what on earth does cloning have to do with anything here?  Well, I also was reading the textbook’s chapter on DNA and RNA and I came to a section titled Cloning.  The first sentence of the chapter goes “One meaning of the word cloning is the process of making an exact copy of an organism.”  A good definition.  Now comes the criticism.  This criticism is based on the four author’s ignorance.  This all reminds me of the saying about the definition of a specialist: “A true specialist is one who learns more and more about less and less until they know everything there is to know about nothing!”

The book’s section on cloning demonstrates this.  Here are a couple of excerpts from this section that demonstrates this.  “Cloning of plants may hold promise for increasing the yields of crops.”  Also “By planting young (cocoa) trees that are clones of plants with desirable characteristics, farmers may be able to increase their cocoa producution.”  Come on now! This sounds almost science fiction.  But the problem is, is that people have been doing this for thousands of years!  Some examples of plant clones:  Red Pontiac potatoes, Delicious apple trees, most all garlic, Redhaven peach, Weeping Willow,  Montmorency cherry, Concord Grape, Bartlett pear…actually I could name thousands of clones.  We have one tree of the Court Pendu Platt apple.  Apparently the first Court Pendu Platt apple was cloned by the Romans before Jesus’s birth.  I also have some Calville Blanc D’Hiver apples which believed were first cloned in the 1500′s.  By the way, Calville has more Vitamin C then an orange and it makes the very best fall pies.  (Me thinks the od Gravenstein apple makes even better pies but it is an early fall apple in Michigan and doesn’t keep well.)  You see, every named fruit tree is a clone (this cloning is done by grafting or budding) also every named potato is a clone.  This is done by simply dropping the potato in the ground.  As a general statement (which probably has some exceptions) I can state with moderate confidence, “All types of asexual reproduction results in a cloned organism.”  Apparently, the four author’s of the textbook I refer to didn’t know this.  By the way, despite this omission I really love the book and heartily recommend it.  It is very well done!

 

Coldest morning of the winter so far–maybe safe now for ice fishing!

This morning (2/11/2012) the temperature dropped to 2F with crystal clear skies.  If it wasn’t for that 2 inches of snow that fell yesterday I would say for Pickerel and Kimbal lakes would be generally safe for ice fishing except for those normally slow to freeze spots.  I plan on checking the ice this morning and leaving an update on the ice condition.

(I sure hope my lettuce planting survived last night.  I did put a red 75 watt light bulb beneath the low tunnel yesterday.)

UPDATE AT 10:40AM — the ice in front of my home on Pickerel Lake is about 3 inches thick and the quality of the ice is fairly good.  Most, but not all, people think this is safe enough ice to walk on but not snowmobile on — definitely not to drive on!  Unless we have a warm rain or lots of snow the ice should stay fairly good all week.  Clear nights really help make ice even with air temps slightly above freezing.  The reason for this is simple — a clear sky has a temp reading of between -100 and -150F.  This is true even on hot summer nights as long as you can see stars clearly.  If you don’t believe it get yourself a good infrared thermometer and point it up at the clear sky.  Try this on a July day with temps in the 90s and you will get the same -100F reading–as long as you don’t point the thermometer at the sun or at a cloud.  Also, checked the lettuce and it seems to have come through last night’s near zero temps!

Does TMV(Tobacco Mosaic Virus) cause lung and other cancers?

When I started growing tomatoes for sale, many years ago, I read quite a bit about tomato diseases.  While there are many diseases of tomatoes, the Tobacco Mosaic Virus Disease stood out in my mind because many experts mentioned that TMV (Tobacco Mosaic Virus), which is found in ALL tobacco products, can devastate tomato plants (and some other plants such as peppers and eggplants) and is especially damaging to young plants grown in greenhouses.  The potential for serious problems is so great that growers are cautioned to not let visitors enter their greenhouse if they smoked cigarettes, pipes or cigars recently.  This knowledge is what set my mind thinking…

Is the Common TMV (Tobacco Mosaic Virus) a Possible Agent that is Responsible for Some Lung, Oral and Throat Cancers?

 by

Tom Fox

 The TMV virus, which infects many tobacco plants, resists tobacco manufacturing processes to such a degree that most commercial growers will not allow those who have recently used tobacco products to enter their greenhouse if plants from the nightshade family (e.g. tomatoes and peppers) are growing.  Many growers also do not allow tobacco use in their tomato, potato, pepper and eggplant fields.  These growers know that the TMV from tobacco will devestate their crops.  While plant viruses, such as TMV, aren’t believed to be able to replicate in human cells,  Didier Raoult of the University of the Mediterranean in Marseilles, France,  believes he had found evidence in 2010 that the PMMV (Pepper Mild Mottle Virus) can cause fever, aches and itching in humans.  Raoult  doesn’t claim he discovered direct infection of human cells by the virus, but viral RNA (ribonucleic acid) accidental interfering with the human RNA.   The possibility of TMV being involved in the etiology of lung cancer has been discussed as long ago as 1960 when P.W. Bothwell (M.D. D.P.H. Univ. of Birmingham, England ) speculated in The Lancet that perhaps the combustion processes of tobacco burning might provide the media for modifying the TMV so that it could upset the normal RNA/protein mechanism in lung cells.  While this is an interesting hypothesis, it doesn’t seem to fit the likely scenario since it has been found that smokeless tobacco use, especially snuff dipping, is also associated with above normal oral cancer rates.   Alternatively, some may argue against TMV being involved in the etiology of smoking tobacco since, they argue, the high temperatures would destroy the viruses.  This is probably true.  However, the smoke that is drawn through the non-burning part of the tobacco could easily dislodge the viral particles from the tobacco and carry it to the user. In other words, the problem could be the non-burning part of the tobacco and not directly by the burning tobacco.

Research has indicated that Benzo[a]pyrene is a carcinogen and is found in tobacco smoke. Benzo[a]pyrene is also found in many foods such as overdone charcoal broiled steak and burnt toast.  Benzo[a]pyrene, found in tobacco smoke (including cigarette smoke), was shown to cause genetic damage in lung cells that was identical to the damage observed in the DNA of most malignant lung tumors.  Since DNA damage is believed to be the underlying cause of mutations leading to cancer, it follows that it is thought that benzo[a]pyrene, may be an important etiologic agent of lung cancer.  Nonetheless, the high oral cancer rate (especially cheek and gum cancers) among snuff dippers, compared to nontobacco users, implies that tobacco itself, and not just tobacco smoke, is a carcinogen.   The chemical family of nitrosomenes occurs in both tobacco smoke and tobacco itself.  In 1956, two British scientists, John Barnes and Peter Magee, reported that dimethylnitrosamine produced liver tumours in rats. Research was undertaken and approximately 90% of nitrosamine compounds were deemed to be carcinogenic.  The problem is that nitrosomenes are found in many foods and other consumables that are consumed by both tobacco and nontobacco users.  It seems logical to assume there is something unique to tobacco that is the cause of enormously high (some data suggests a 50 fold increase!) cheek and gum cancer rates in those people who are long term snuff dippers.  While some data suggests that nitrosamines may be responsible for this increase — the Swedish usually use a pasteurizing technique, (instead of heat treating it) of curing the tobacco for snuff use (they call it snus) which results in lower nitrosamines and apparently lower cancer rate.  However, it is just possible that this unique curing technique also results in damaging or even destroying the tobacco’s TMV.  The traditional heat treatment of curing tobacco does not destroy the TMV since this method uses a maximum temperature of 72C and it is known that TMV can survive at a temperature as high as 79C.  While nitrosamines, like TMV, do contact the cells of both smokers and nonsmokers, Health New Zealand concluded, in their study, that carcinogens and toxicants were present only below harmful levels in “smokeless” tobacco products.  This data seems to point to an unknown etiologic agent that is responsible for most tobacco related cancers.  Logically, this points to the need for serious studies to determine if TMV could be this unknown etiologic agent.  If it is, the risk associated with the use of tobacco products could be reduced by the removal of or destruction of the TMV before use.

I am not implying here with this discussion that TMV can replicate itself in a human cell or that it is infectious in a manner similar to the influenza virus.  In a way it might be appropriate to think of TMV as an environmental, natural occurring chemical that when in sufficient concentrations can damage human cell’s DNA.  Also possible is that the TMV can affect negatively the cell’s DNA repair enzymes.

One test of this theory is to eliminate the TMV by heating the tobacco to temperatures in excess of 81C.  Sterilization via irradiation is another option. The TMV eliminated tobacco can then be available for research trials.  Before this is done, however, the Swedish Snus should be tested for active TMV.  If there is a reduction in TMV levels this would seem to indicate an increase in probability that TMV is an important etiological agent for cancer and it would be fitting and proper to go ahead with the appropriate trials.